Our beatific beautician friend Heather Veitch was written up in the London Telegraph and Irish Independent for her work bringing porners to Jesus in articles titled “Ex-stripper spreads God’s word to sleazy world of porno”.
Nothing like laying it on thick. Do you need the word “sleazy” when writing about “porno”? I have worked at publications where the word “porno” is prohibited in the style (ha ha) guide because “porno” sounds sleazy where “porn” and “adult” do not, or do not, as much.
Or perhaps the papers believe that parts of the porno world are not sleazy, and that Veitch and JC’s Girls are ministering only to the decadent part of it?
If so, which parts of the porno world are not sleazy?
If so, which parts of the porno world are not sleazy?
Craft services?